Training & Capacity Development

Importance of Training & Capacity Development

While the Sendai Framework provides the roadmap for disaster risk reduction, Training and Capacity Developmentprovide the engine. Under Priority 4 (“Enhancing disaster preparedness”), comprehensive workshops and skills training are not merely educational activities—they are the decisive factor between a community that panics and one that responds to save lives.

The Strategic Imperative: Why Training Matters

In the “Golden Hour”—the first 60 minutes after a calamity strikes, professional first responders are often unable to reach every affected area due to blocked infrastructure. During this critical window, bystanders become the true first responders.

Capacity Development is the process of equipping these individuals, communities, and organizations with the knowledge, skills, and resources to manage risk. It transforms a passive population into an active resilience force.

  • Decentralized Response: Training empowers local communities to act immediately, reducing reliance on centralized aid that may be delayed.

  • Psychological Resilience: Knowledge reduces fear. When individuals know what to do, panic is replaced by purpose, significantly reducing chaos-induced injuries.

  • Resource Optimization: Trained volunteers can accurately assess needs, preventing the “second disaster” of uncoordinated, unsolicited aid clogging supply lines.

The Anatomy of a Comprehensive Preparedness Workshop

To be effective, training must move beyond basic awareness to actionable, “muscle-memory” skills. A professional curriculum for community response (often modeled after CERT – Community Emergency Response Team standards) should include:

1. Life-Saving Medical Operations

  • Triage (START Method): Teaching non-medical personnel the Simple Triage And Rapid Treatment technique. This involves sorting victims into categories (Immediate, Delayed, Minor, Deceased) in under 60 seconds per person to maximize survival rates.

  • Hemorrhage Control: Advanced techniques for stopping severe bleeding, including the proper application of tourniquets and pressure dressings.

  • Airway Management: Basic maneuvers to open airways for unconscious victims (e.g., Head-Tilt/Chin-Lift).

2. Light Search and Rescue (SAR)

  • Size-up: Training volunteers to assess structural damage (Light vs. Moderate vs. Heavy) before entering a building.

  • Search Patterns: Implementing systematic search techniques (e.g., “Right-Hand Rule”) to ensure no room is missed while maintaining rescuer orientation.

  • Victim Extrication: Safe lifting and carrying techniques (e.g., blanket carry, chair carry) to move immobile victims without causing further spinal injury.

3. Disaster Psychology & Communication

  • Psychological First Aid: Techniques like SOLER (Sit squarely, Open posture, Lean forward, Eye contact, Relax) to de-escalate panic and comfort traumatized survivors.

  • Tactical Communication: Using standardized terminology to communicate with professional responders via radio or runners.

Case Study in Excellence: The “Zero Casualty” Mission

The measurable impact of capacity building is best illustrated by the state of Odisha, India.

  • The Challenge: In 1999, a Super Cyclone claimed nearly 10,000 lives.

  • The Capacity Building: Over two decades, the state invested heavily in training coastal volunteers (Aapda Mitra), conducting regular evacuation drills, and empowering local leaders.

  • The Result: When Cyclone Dana (2024) and Cyclone Phailin (2013) struck with similar ferocity, the death tolls were reduced to double digits—a 99% reduction in mortality. This success was not due to better technology alone, but to a populace that had been trained to evacuate and respond.

Implementation: The “Train the Trainer” Model

For organizations and governments, the most sustainable path to capacity development is the Train-the-Trainer (ToT)model.

  1. Identify Leaders: Select respected community members or employees to become “Master Trainers.”

  2. Standardize Curriculum: Ensure all training materials align with national guidelines (e.g., NDMA, FEMA) to prevent conflicting information.

  3. Regular Simulations: Skills degrade without practice. Annual “Full-Scale Exercises” (simulating a real disaster scenario) are essential to test the retention of skills and the efficacy of the response plan.

Investing in concrete skills training—search and rescue, triage, and fire suppression—is the highest-yield investment a leader can make in disaster risk reduction. It ensures that when the “unthinkable” happens, the community does not just survive; it leads the response.

Scroll to Top